The Associated Press reports, "A judge in New Orleans has blocked a 6-month moratorium on new deep water drilling projects, but the fight isn't over. The White House has promised to quickly appeal the ruling."

Considering the BP oil spill, considering the ecological damages, considering the the government does not have in place a regime to check deep water drilling operations for safety, a six-month drilling moratorium is in the public interest, and the federal judge who lifted the moratorium is either deaf, dumb, and blind, or something else --

Is he a corrupt judge? Does he run a crooked court? Does he sits on a rotten bench? Does he bring honest justice -- or brought justice? Was he looking out for the public interest, or is he a New Orleans style judge, who takes care of the interest of his bank account first?

The Huff Post reports that the judge, Martin Feldman, according to financial disclosure forms from 2008 held energy stocks in Transocean and Halliburton, as well as two of BP's largest U.S. private shareholders -- BlackRock and JP Morgan Chase."

Wouldn't a honest judge, with such financial connections, recuse himself?